| |
Bankruptcy isn’t the solution to every
financial problem. Bankruptcy has its
limitations, and its costs. Accordingly, before
we recommend proceeding under the Bankruptcy
Code, we consider whether the
financially-troubled client’s objectives can be
met by other means.
Can the burden of debt which threatens the
debtor be eased through refinancing? Can
provision of greater information, additional
safeguards or greater security encourage
creditors to give the client the breathing room
which is needed? Can an intelligent presentation
to creditors concerning the reality of a
bankruptcy proceeding convince them that would
not be in their interest? If the debtor is a
business, can relations be restructured, or a
work-out plan reached, analogous to what might
result in bankruptcy but without the expense of
a
Chapter 11 or
Chapter 12 proceeding? If liquidation is
necessary, can that objective be met through an
assignment for the benefit of creditors?
These are the kinds of factors which counsel
should consider for their financially-troubled
clients, but often do not. Quality counsel may
conclude that a bankruptcy filing is
appropriate, but they should never assume that
that is necessarily the proper course.
   |
|