Murray v. Gemplus Int’l, S.A., 217 F.R.D. 362 (E.D. Pa. 2003);

VLT, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2003 WL 151399 (D. Mass. 2003);

JWP Zack, Inc. v. Hoosier Energy Rural Elec. Co-op., Inc., 709 N.E.2d 336 (Ind. App. 1999);

Cooper v. Dunmore Homes, Inc., 2007 WL 2460740 (Cal. App. 3d Dist. 2007);

American Bar Association Committee on Negotiated Acquisitions, Model Joint Venture Agreement with Commentary (Am. Bar Ass’n 2007);

American Jurisprudence 2d: 23 Am. Jur. 2d, Depositions and Discovery §§ 27, 30, 49, 137, 144; 81 Am. Jur. 2d, Witnesses § 282;

American Jurisprudence Business & Legal Forms: 2B Am. Jur. Legal Forms 2d, Ch. 25 Assignments, Summary; 3 Am. Jur. Legal Forms 2d, Ch. 30 Attorneys, Part I; 15 Am. Jur. Legal Forms 2d, Physicians & Surgeons § 202:2.

American Jurisprudence Pleading & Practice Forms: 9A Am. Jur. Pl. & Pr. Forms, Estoppel & Waiver, Parts I, II and III References; 9A Am. Jur. Pl. & Pr. Forms, Evidence, Part  I; 10A Am. Jur. Pl. & Pr. Forms, Expert & Opinion Evidence, Part I References;

George L. Blum, J.D., "Communications" Within Testimonial Privilege of Confidential Communications Between Husband and Wife as Including Knowledge Derived from Observation by One Spouse of Acts of Other Spouse, 23 A.L.R. 6th 1 (2007);

A. Lee Bradford, Member of the Florida Bar, Motions for Production and Inspection, 4 Am. Jur. Trials 223 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Kenneth S. Broun, Brandis Professor of Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Memorandum to the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules of the Judicial Conference (Jud. Conf. Adv. Comm. on Evidence Rules 2005); 

California Law Revision Com’n, Recommendation: Waiver of Privilege by Disclosure, Calif. Law Revision Com’n 2004-2005 Recommendations 265  (Pub. 221 Nov. 2004);

California Law Revision Com’n, Staff Memorandum 2001-29: Evidence Code Changes Required by Electronic Communications (May 14, 2001);

Paul M. Crimmins, Member of the Illinois Bar, Tax Treatment Of Contingent Liabilities On The Sale Of A Business, 40 DePaul L. Rev. 819 (1991);

Richard L. Cupp, Jr., Professor of Law, Pepperdine University, Redesigning Successor Liability, 1999 U. Ill. L. Rev. 845;

Martin L. Dean et al., Managing Litigation, 51 Am. Jur. Trials 1 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Byron F. Egan, Member of the Texas Bar, Dealing with Auditors After Sarbanes-Oxley (Univ. Tex. Corp. Counsel Inst. 2006);

Byron F. Egan, Member of the Texas Bar, et al., How to Respond to Audit Letters (State Bar of Tex. C.L.E. Program 2005);

Byron F. Egan, Member of the Texas Bar, Training Lawyers & Law Students How to Do Deals  (Am. Bar Ass’n Section of Bus. L. Spring Program 2003);

Thomas M. Geisher, Jr., Member of the New York Bar, Proof of Basis for, and Grounds for Lifting, Work Product Protection Against Discovery, 39 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 1 (June 2007 Update);

Thomas M. Geisher, Jr., Member of the New York Bar, Proof of Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege, 32 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 189 (June 2007 Update);

Christopher N. George, Member of the Illinois Bar, Someone's Watching: Protecting Privilege On Both Sides Of The Table During Electronic Discovery, 2004 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 283;

Timothy P. Glynn, Professor of Law, Seton Hall Univ., One Privilege to Rule Them All? Some Post-Sarbanes-Oxley and Other Reflections on a Federally Codified Attorney-Client Privilege, 38 Loyola L.A. L. Rev. 597 (2004);

Richard J. Heafey, Member of the California Bar and of the Adjunct Faculty,
University of San Francisco Law School, Return to Sender? Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Information, http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/338 (Berkeley Elec. Press 2004);

Janet L. Higley, Member of the North Carolina Bar, et al., Confidentiality of Communications by In-House Counsel for Financial Institutions, 6 N. Car. Banking Inst. 265 (2002);

Richard M. Hynes, Associate Professor, William & Mary School of Law, Bankruptcy & State Collections: The Case of the Missing Garnishments, 91 Cornell L. Rev.  603 (2006);

Illinois Compiled Statutes Annotated (West): 735 ILCS 5/2-209, 8-801, 8-802, 8-802.1, 8-802.2, 8-803, 8-901; 740 ILCS 170/1, 2, 2.1, 5; 815 ILCS 505/1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 6.1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10a, 10b, 11, 11a, 12; 820 ILCS 115/1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14;

Edward J. Imwinkelried, Professor of Law, University of California at Davis, Determining Preliminary Facts Under Federal Rule 104, 45 Am. Jur. Trials 1 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Leland V. Jones, Assistant Professor, Police Science Department, California State College at Los Angeles, Locating and Preserving Evidence In Criminal Case, 1 Am. Jur. Trials 555 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Dennis R. Kiker, Member of the Virginia Bar, Waiving the Privilege in a Storm of Data: An Argument for Uniformity and Rationality in Dealing with the Inadvertent Production of Privileged Materials in the Age of Electronically Stored Information,  12 Richmond J.L. & Tech. 15 (2006);

Dennis R. Kiker, Member of the Virginia Bar, The Privilege Sieve: Inadvertent Disclosure of E-Information, For the Defense 26 (Defense Research Inst. June 2006);

Jason J. Kilborn, Assistant Professor of Law, Louisiana State University, Mercy, Rehabilitation, and Quid Pro Quo: A Radical Reassessment of Individual Bankruptcy, 64 Ohio St. L.J.  855 (2003);

Damon A. King, J.D., Competency of One Spouse to Testify Against Other in Prosecution for Offense Against Child of Both or Either or Neither, 119 A.L.R. 5th 275 (2004);

Richard J. Kohlman, Member of the California Bar, Protected Communication Between Physician and Patient, 45 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 595 (June 2007 Update);

Richard J. Kohlman, Member of the California Bar, Trial Court Restrictions on Evidence of Defendant's Wealth, 30 Am. Jur. Trials 711 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Raymond P. Kolak, Member of the Illinois Bar, The Dangers Of Successor Liability When Buying Illinois Business Assets, 93 Ill. B.J. 640 (2005);

Monique C.M. Leahy, Member of the Washington Bar, Use of Call Detail Record Evidence in Telecommunications "Phantom Traffic" and Other Litigation, 86 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 217 (June 2007 Update);

Monique C.M. Leahy, Member of the Washington Bar, Telecommunications and Other Litigation: Call Detail Records and Fraud, 97 Am. Jur. Trials 1 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Monique C.M. Leahy, Member of the Washington Bar, et al., Admission of E-mail Evidence in Civil Actions,  103 Am. Jur. Trials 123 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Sam A. Mackie, Member of the Florida Bar and Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Central Florida, Proof of Unauthorized Disclosure of Confidential Patient Information by a Psychotherapist, 24 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 123 (June 2007 Update);

P. Magarick, Member of the New York Bar, Investigating the Civil Case – General Principles, 1 Am. Jur. Trials 357 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Kenneth J. Melilli, Professor of Law, Albany Law School, Witness Preparation, 61 Am. Jur. Trials 269 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Edward A. Morse, McGrath North Mullin & Kratz Chair in Business Law, Creighton University School of Law, Technological Entanglements: Evidentiary and Ethical Considerations of Metadata in Interjurisdictional Litigation, 2 J. Int’l Com’l L. & Tech. 94 (2007);

Robert P. Mosteller, Chadwick Professor of Law, Duke University, Admissibility of Fruits of Breached Evidentiary Privileges: The Importance of Adversarial Fairness, Party Culpability, and Fear of Immunity, 81 Wash. U.L.Q. 961 (2003);

Catherine Palo, J.D., LL.M., The Use of Discovery in Product-Related Burn Injury Cases, 99 Am. Jur. Trials 141 (Nov. 2007 Update);

C.S. Parnell, Effect Of Divorce Or Annulment On Competency Of One Former Spouse As Witness Against Other In Criminal Prosecution, 38 A.L.R. 2d 570 (June 2007 Update);

Andrew N. Plasz, Member of the Illinois Bar, Waiver Of Privilege For Documents Inadvertently Disclosed During Discovery, 93 Ill. B.J. 126 (2005);

Henry B. Rothblatt, Member of the New York Bar, Pretrial Procedures and Motions In Criminal Cases, 5 Am. Jur. Trials 27 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Paul D. Seyferth, Member of the Missouri Bar, Taking the Deposition of the Sexual Harassment Plaintiff, 65 Am. Jur. Trials 65 (Nov. 2007 Update);

Gregory D. Shelton, Member of the Washington Bar, et al., Protecting Against Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege or Work-Product Protection Due to Inadvertent Disclosure, Bar News (Wash. St. Bar Ass’n June 2007);

Marjorie A. Shields, J.D., Discovery of Deleted E-mail and Other Deleted Electronic Records, 27 A.L.R. 6th 565 (2007);

Marjorie A. Shields, J.D., Application of Attorney-Client Privilege to Electronic Documents, 26 A.L.R. 6th 287 (2007);

Marjorie A. Shields, J.D., Invocation and Effect of State Secrets Privilege, 23 A.L.R. 6th 521 (2007);

Mikah K. Story, Assoc. Prof. of Law, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 21st Century Pillow-Talk: Applicability of Marital Communications Privilege to Electronic Mail, http://law.bepress/expresso/eps/1747 (Berkeley Elec. Press 2006);

Andrew R. Taggart, Member of the Illinois Bar, Parent-Subsidiary Communications and the Attorney-Client Privilege, 65 U. Chi. L. Rev. 315 (1998);

United States Code Annotated (West): U.S.C.A. Const., Amend. I References & Annotations, Amend. XIV References & Annotations; Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 16; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 26, 34, 45; Federal Rules of Evidence, Rules 501, 801; 5 U.S.C.A. § 552; 12 U.S.C.A. § 1811; 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2511, 2517; 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332; 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983;

Leon L. Wolfstone, Member of the Washington Bar, Discovery-Oral Depositions, 4 Am. Jur. Trials 119 (Nov. 2007 Update);

John T. Woodall, Member of the Georgia Bar, Commonsense Principles of Civil Litigation, 52 Am. Jur. Trials 1 (Nov. 2007 Update); 

Ken M. Zeidner, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Inadvertent Disclosure & The Attorney-Client Privilege: Looking to the Work-Product Doctrine for Guidance, 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 1315 (2001).